Vampire's Slice of Life by SocialHippo

not sure about later parts of the story, but how does a single sentence that mentions mother having past relations with women automatically make the story yuri ? I mean the story did not go as far as describing what was happenings, its as nutty as saying that because there are mad people in the world and by definition you are also mad.

Also the dude above was hinting that mother and sister have regular sex behind MC and it is written in the novel, I was counter arguing that in fact it is not so, it is only 3some with MC. I did not say anything else. As well as her powerful friends do not have regular sex as the comment above was saying. it is only mentioned in the passing that it was something that happened roughly 500-600 years ago.

Next time when you comment, you should first fully understand the context and then comment.

EDIT:
also I reread my comment, please point out where I said its not yuri ?

I believe the point of my comment was to argue against the story being netorare. talking about the comment of



if you mistakenly believed I responded to Narayan then thats your own mistake. As I believe it was clear enough I was making statement against the one above this responding to Narayans confusions