868 burn one's boats
“Hype, which hand is behind it? Malicious hype, which hand is behind the scenes?？”
The next day, "U.S. Weekly" published a special report written by Gavin Hunter.
The detailed and rich content is eight pages long, eloquent and vast. It is in direct contrast with the special report written by "Entertainment Weekly" 48 hours ago, once again pushing the "Hypegate" heat wave to a new height, and also spreading throughout North America. An atomic bomb was dropped on the area, just like what happened to Nagasaki and Hiroshima during World War II..
Unlike "Entertainment Weekly" which used concerts as its starting point, "American Weekly" used the Toronto Film Festival two years ago as its starting point and unexpectedly restored the Natalie Portman incident that continues to this day..
Chapter One: Toronto Scandal Hype Incident.
Two years have passed by in a hurry, and the things that happened back then have gradually been settled..
Natalie is still the first actor in Generation Y to win an Oscar; Natalie's relationship with Benjamin Millepied has also surfaced, and their first child has been born. The accusations and criticisms gradually settled down and nothing happened; Natalie's career entered a period of slowdown. The box office performance of both "Thor" and "Unrequited" was unsatisfactory, and there were no new art films for the time being. information.
Now, "U.S. Weekly" has revisited the old story and told in detail the origins of the scandal - "Entertainment Weekly" and "U.S. Weekly" were the real initiators, but "U.S. Weekly" chose to follow up on Renly's story line, and then witnessed the success of "Buried Alive"; while "Entertainment Weekly" followed up on Natalie's line, and then discovered the relationship between Natalie and Benjamin, and uncovered the censure of the double in one go.
In other words, Renly is not only not the hype behind the scenes, but also the victim of the incident. The so-called malicious hype is nothing more than an academy public relations game between the "Black Swan" crew and "Entertainment Weekly".
Chapter 2: Oscar’s Absence Incident.
The incident started when the paparazzi sneaked into the hospital and accidentally discovered Renly's health problems, which then triggered various speculations; after the official response from the "Cancer Me" crew and Andy Rogers, "Entertainment Weekly" began to fan the flames, Thinking that this was a news "staged" incident to promote the movie and compete for the Oscars, reporters in Los Angeles subsequently sent the "Seattle Expedition" to dig out the truth..
As a result, Renly clarified the facts and missed the Oscars and the Academy's public relations throughout the awards season due to health reasons. However, "Entertainment Weekly" still refused to give up, and the follow-up can be extended to the premiere of "Fighting Cancer".
Renly was one of the victims of the bloody accident at the Lincoln Center premiere, but he shouldered the heavy responsibility of maintaining order at the scene and preventing further damage. Lauren Mesler, the person involved in the incident, was the best witness. , similarly, other viewers at the premiere that night were also indirect witnesses..
However, "Entertainment Weekly" once again accused Renly of malicious hype and doing whatever it took to win the movie's box office..
Chapter 3, "Fast and Furious" sequel events.
First of all, the pay game has always been a part of Hollywood. Starring in commercial movies and pursuing higher pay is understandable. What's more, Renly never put pressure on the crew in public and tried to use the power of the Internet to increase his pay; on the contrary, Fan -Diesel has repeatedly used media pressure to create the image of Renly as a rebel..
Secondly, after Renly announced his withdrawal from sequel production, discordant rumors broke out within the "Fast and Furious" crew, not just Vin Diesel and Renly Hall, but Vin Diesel to be precise. Standing on the opposite side of all other actors, Universal Pictures finally raised the salary of all actors for the sequel. Which is right and which is wrong is clear at a glance.
Giving up the "Fast and Furious" sequel and choosing "Edge of Tomorrow" is just a parallel crossover choice. It is not a game between actors, but more of a duel between agents and film companies..
The incident has been settled, but "Entertainment Weekly" once again stirred up trouble and fanned the flames. Not only did it believe that Renly was deliberately hyping up the film for the sake of salary, but it also criticized "Edge of Tomorrow" and Warner Bros. The news continues to be hot. Too high.
Chapter 4, Concert.
The essence in the final analysis is this: neither Renly Hall's personal side nor Eleven Studio's corporate side made any reports on "One Man's Concert". Within the first forty-eight hours after the website page was published, The entire network was calm and no news came out..
For a "premeditated" concert, there was only four days of preparation time. There was no speeding up of publicity, no contact with the media for reporting, or even cooperating with fans to build momentum. Forty-eight hours were left in vain, completely silent and silent. its changes.
The first one to report on the concert was "Entertainment Weekly". In the name of malicious hype, morality hijacked the concert, concocted hot spots and gimmicks, and created a news frenzy in just a few hours, attracting all attention. Concentrated on the concert, and triggered related negative news later.
At the same time, "Entertainment Weekly" achieved a sales boom that has been rare in recent years..
……
“The special report of "American Weekly" is divided into five chapters. The first four chapters list a series of facts in a targeted manner, re-arrange the development context, and restore the truth of the matter..
There is no personal comment, no superfluous opinions, and more facts are cited. At the same time, screenshots of "Entertainment Weekly" reports at the time are attached, just like writing a paper, with sources marked to increase credibility and persuasion. force.
Treat the other person the same way he did. However, Gavin went a step further and truly submitted the evidence, and the original map of the incident was truly and comprehensively presented to the readers..
In the final fifth chapter, Gavin returns to the person at the center of the incident..
“Renly-Hall.
In less than three years, this name has become well-known and popular all over the United States. As a young actor of Generation Y, his rise is really astonishing. He has almost reached the top of the Hollywood pyramid, which is eye-catching and surprising. Confused. No one can deny that the sudden appearance like a meteor has attracted too much attention and triggered too many speculations..
But the young actor has never lost track of his progress. Since first appearing on the small screen in 'The Pacific,' 'Fast & Furious' has been his only commercial film experience, and more often than not, Working hard in the field of literary and independent films, from 'Buried Alive' to 'Crazy Love', to 'Fighting Cancer', and finally 'Transcendence'’.
Time and time again, he demonstrated his talent and strength in front of the audience, profoundly interpreting the meaning of 'actor', and after interpreting it to the extreme, he left it to the audience to judge..
Renly is famous for his right and wrong. Controversies surrounding Renly are constant, but behind every news incident, you can see the behind-the-scenes mastermind who is quietly promoting it. It is not Renly, who is a newcomer, nor a capable brokerage company. Because from the beginning, Renly was defined as an actor, not a star.
It was Entertainment Weekly, Cornell McGregor, and the entire entertainment industry standing behind them that pushed the incident, instigated the news, and created explosive points. Because entertainment lasts to death, because profit comes first, objective reason and Journalists’ ethics gradually become fragmented.
This is a phenomenon of an era, and it is also a tragedy of an era. But this is not news. In the world of Hollywood, every practitioner must accept such challenges, live under the spotlight, and face numerous controversies. .If that was all, then the matter would be innocuous, lively, entertaining, and the storm would be over..
The problem now is that Entertainment Weekly concocted these news and related media promoted these crazes. Then they stood on the opposite side of Renly and stood on the moral high ground, condescendingly accusing Renly of "hype"’？
This may be the most magical and ironic news event in the 21st century. A thief is called a thief. The problem is that people still believe in the culprit who confuses right and wrong. So, who is behind the scenes?？
No one should forget that he was only twenty-two years old, but he gave a performance like "Crazy".”
This may be the most serious and sharp feature report that "Us Weekly" has ever published. This may be the most profound and comprehensive feature report that Gavin has written in his career. It not only comprehensively analyzes the ins and outs of everything. , and repeatedly emphasize the key points intentionally or unintentionally——
“Entertainment Weekly" and Cornell McGregor.
Gavin completely ignored "One Man's Concert". He didn't mention Heather Cross, or the grand occasion of the concert that night, or even Renly's positive response at the door of the apartment. The fog, the arrow points directly to the real man behind the scenes.
This move is very bold and crazy. It is almost equivalent to giving up defense and choosing to attack with all its strength. Like a sharp sword, it cuts a gap in the chaotic news reports and attracts everyone's attention. Attracted.
In fact, for the past twenty-four hours, all the news media had focused on Renly..
After being interviewed while standing at the door of the apartment, Renly's response and statement were interpreted by the major media in different ways and from different angles, once again igniting the "hype scandal" and putting on a show of seeking the truth. The noble attitude triggered a new round of discussion.
But now, the situation has become embarrassing. After the special report in "Us Weekly" came out, people turned back to "Entertainment Weekly". In less than twenty hours, the article written by Cornell.
really.
“Acquiesce in the accusation, act boldly and confidently! Hypocrites once again set the limits of self-promotion in Hollywood.”
Cornell once again used sharp language to launch a powerful attack on Renly, but this article is different from the previous topic in that it lacks facts. The entire article is almost Cornell's self-interpretation, which is biased. Opinions with a strong personal bias.
So, things suddenly became interesting. Could it be that the special report in "American Weekly" is the real fact? Could it be that Renly Hall is also a victim?？
Comments