2381 complex
“Bang！”
The door to the screening room of Lumiere Hall was pushed open hard, and a middle-aged reporter with a messy beard appeared angrily in front of everyone..
“Damn it! Self-righteous stupidity! Claiming to be smart is just showing off your own cleverness! I don’t know what I mean! It's just a pile of smelly horse manure! It really should be thrown directly into the trash can! Where have all the smart and wise things gone? All that's left is a meaningless empty shelf! I bet he must feel that he is very powerful, playing with the audience at the palm of his hand! If this continues, he will be finished sooner or later！”
Talking and cursing, the middle-aged man swept past like a tornado, talking to himself without stopping at all. His ferocious face and expression were showing strong negative emotions, making people believe that if If someone blocks his way, he could roll up his sleeves at any moment and swing his fist to the opponent's chin without even a second's hesitation..
So, what happened？
The audience and reporters who gathered at the entrance of Lumiere Hall all cast doubtful glances. No one dared to step forward to ask the other party what was going on. Then they made way to a small path and watched the reporter walk away. , he was still mumbling, "I can't believe I wasted a whole morning just for such a mess! If I had known better, I would have gone to the special attention unit to explore the secret treasure.！”
mess？
waste of time？
The few words made the onlookers who were watching melon-eating become more and more confused: Could it be that "lobster" collapsed?？
Although the capacity of the Lumière Hall is limited and there are still many spectators who were not able to enter the venue immediately, a large number of curious spectators and reporters still gathered outside the venue, eagerly looking forward to getting feedback at the venue as soon as possible. , the lively scene of three floors inside and three outside is absolutely rare even in Cannes - looking at the world, only Renly can have such a strong appeal..
However, the direction of things is a bit confusing.
Indeed, everyone is complaining now. It seems that every release of Renly's works is a "fancy praise conference". Film critics and reporters are racking their brains to praise Renly. The vocabulary of "career best" has developed To the point of making people vomit, this situation is really annoying..
But looking at it from another perspective, even if Renly really encounters "Waterloo", the current audience does not believe how bad the quality of Renly's works will be. The brand effect of "Renly-Hall" has been deeply rooted in people's hearts. Even back then, "Detachment" is now being revived among senior movie fans..
So, I suddenly saw reporters leaving the venue early and cursing. This kind of psychological gap made the people who were eating melons uncomfortable. They should have been happy that "things finally did not end in a standard way"; but the actual situation was confusing and not at all. I understand what happened so that I can't be happy anymore.
Could it be that...the expectations are too high? So much so that it created a huge psychological gap, which led to negative reviews？
But no one can answer, because the people waiting at the door are poor children who have not been able to watch the premiere. Now they can only look at each other, but they don’t know the Lumiere Hall. What exactly happened there? The feeling of uneasiness even surpassed the excitement and excitement of "Renly may be in Waterloo".
Then...waiting and waiting, applause came intermittently in the Lumiere Hall, but it was neither enthusiastic nor turbulent. It seemed to be just a polite response; but slowly, the applause became louder and louder. It is getting thicker and thicker, and even standing on the sidelines can clearly capture the enthusiasm, and it continues to rise..
Not only were there no answers to the questions, but there were more and more questions, and there were more and more speculations in the exchange of glances. Faintly, the expectations also became nervous - such a scene is somewhat similar to the premiere of "Interstellar" Similar, but compared to "Interstellar", the feedback information of "Lobster" is obviously clearer.
At least, it ended with thunderous applause from the audience. But considering the slamming door and long silence in the initial stage, things became complicated and confusing..
Even after the show ended, the questions still had not been answered. The first comments posted on Twitter can give a glimpse of the tip of the iceberg..
“A masterpiece! Yorgos Lanthimos once again showed his amazing talent! Renly Hall's unconventional comedy performance is even more eye-catching！”
“It's a bit regretful that it stopped at one concept but failed to deepen it further. Yorgos Lanthimos failed to really get a glimpse of the essence. Obviously, the film still has more room for progress and exploration. The interesting opening finally settled in the ending. Confusion, failed to achieve the effect.”
“Using interpersonal relationships to allude to social class, Lanthimos's attempt went a step further and once again brought a stunning wave of reflection..”
“The dramatic placement is still a bit clumsy, and the transitions are still not smooth enough. It is obvious that the alienation between the character and the plot is obvious. Lanthimos can do better, and the overall effect is slightly inferior to "Dog Tooth"; however, Choosing Renly Hall and Rachel Weisz was a stroke of genius.”
“With the lens, tones, transitions and atmosphere, Yorgos Lanthimos has initially demonstrated his aura as a master. This chilling yet hilarious black comedy is definitely the most popular one on the big screen this year. A unique movie viewing experience.”
“Excellent concept, execution could be better.”
“Best of the year! From the script to the performances to the camerawork and finally the soundtrack and editing, it was perfect! natural！”
“I don't like it. It should be said that I can't like it - it's obviously a subject that can be deepened more deeply, but in the end it settled on marriage and love in vain..”
“Isn’t Renly Hall the best?？”
debate.
debate.
Still arguing.
Different from the controversies caused by works such as "Transcendence", "Interstellar", and "Breaking Drummer", it can be clearly noticed that the comments on "The Lobster" are more of a mixed emotion, somewhere between hating and liking. A neutral feeling between praise and criticism, overall somewhat moderate.
How should we describe it?？
In other words, the emotions are not particularly extreme, not the difference between zero and one hundred, but the difference between sixty and eighty. This ambiguous viewing experience is actually a kind of harm to the movie, because it It also means that if the emotion of watching the movie is not strong enough, it will eventually become mediocre..
However, the problem is that "Lobster" is far from mediocre. There are more things that can be captured in those words, but what they are exactly can only wait for the audience to watch and dig out for themselves..
However, Twitter is just Twitter after all, and those comments can only be used as a reference..
Every year at major film festivals, there are endless voices on Twitter exclaiming "masterpieces". In the main competition section alone, you may see more than one "masterpiece", and then create a kind of all-maintenance The illusion that all the competition works are candidates for the best of the year made the audience who did not have the chance to arrive at the scene couldn't help but get excited..
But what about the actual situation?？
We won’t know until the movie is actually released.
Immediately afterwards, the door to the screening room of the Lumière Hall opened, and the audience attending the premiere finally appeared and poured down like a torrent..
“I think it's not just about love......”
“Still about marriage.”
“No, no, no, I mean, it's not just that, it's about the whole social order. Do you understand? I think myopic women represent the cunning ruling class......”
“You're over-interpreting it, it's so deep？”
Men in twos and threes are exchanging opinions with each other, but no one can convince anyone. Everyone has their own opinion; not far away, groups of women are also expressing their own opinions. , but the perspective gives the movie a different perspective.
“I think he's going to stab himself blind. It's about love versus the system, and David represents love......”
“I have different opinions. I think this is a discussion about the law of survival. David and the myopic woman represent two different ways of survival.......”
“What is this? Is it too far off track? There is no such content at all. Love and marriage are the most obvious superficial topics, and I think the most important part now is, assuming that David blinded his eye and the short-sighted woman did not, what does this mean?？”
“Your interpretations are too deep, but I think that Ouges did not reach such a high level. This is also where I am disappointed with the movie. It can be better..”
The chattering discussions all held different views, but the group of people standing at the door of Lumiere Hall showed another perspective..
“The lens, editing, and soundtrack are really good. Ogus has made great progress and has initially reached the level of a master. I like the whole tone very much..”
“What I like most are the performances and lines. In order to fit Ogoth's cold tone, the actors tried their best to restrain their performances. There were only two explosive scenes that were all handled by Renly.......”
“Yes, yes, yes, one is the dance scene alone in the forest, and the other is the eye contact scene at the end. Renly handled these two scenes so cleverly. Personally, I like this kind of Renly better than In terms of 'Explosion Drummer'.”
“That’s right, that’s too Oscar-worthy. I think the solo dance scene in the forest can be interpreted in depth. That scene completely broke the overall balance. Ogus’s concepts and ideas may be hidden in it. But the movie-watching process was too immersive. I only noticed the shock, but could not savor it carefully.”
“Well, I also think that after watching it for the second time, or even the third time, I must admit that the lines are very fond of me. Did you notice the many details? Regarding David’s ex-wife and brother, there are a lot of lines and details that can be carefully explored. I think the movie is more than what it is now..”
Argument, this is the absolute main theme, not pure love or hate, it seems that everyone can find the parts they like or dislike. This intricate perception has also become the main theme after the movie ended. Within a short time, It is difficult to draw a conclusion that the discussion is really the main trend.
Comments